Crypto Consolidation Intensifies: ARK Invest Warns Soon

ARK Invest analyst Lorenzo Valente warns that crypto is entering a deep consolidation phase as application revenue concentrates among a few platforms, fueling more M&A, Chapter 11 filings and shutdowns across exchanges and protocols.

Crypto Consolidation Intensifies: ARK Invest Warns Soon
Reading time: 5 Minutes
Follow on Google

ARK researcher: crypto entering deep consolidation

ARK Invest’s director of digital asset research, Lorenzo Valente, signaled on July 28 that the crypto industry is moving into a pronounced consolidation phase. According to Valente’s analysis, revenue and investment are concentrating around a shrinking number of projects, while weaker protocols face heightened risk of shutdowns, Chapter 11 filings and acquisition. This trend has implications across DeFi, Layer 1 networks, middleware and application stacks, where revenue concentration is now at historically high levels.

Revenue concentration: the numbers and caveats

Valente highlighted a striking concentration of application revenue: two platforms — Hyperliquid and Pump.fun — reportedly accounted for 67% of application revenue in his post, and adding Ethena pushes the top-three share toward roughly 80%. ARK’s earlier Q1 2026 DeFi report showed total tracked application revenue fell about 23% quarter-over-quarter to nearly $485 million. During that quarter, ARK recorded Hyperliquid at roughly $145 million, Pump.fun at about $123 million and Axiom at $58 million. Those three contributed around 67% of the tracked application revenue through March 31.

Why methodology matters

Public dashboards demonstrate how different metrics change the picture. DeFiLlama’s 30-day protocol revenue snapshot lists Hyperliquid at $37.46 million and Pump.fun at $20.32 million. For Ethena, DeFiLlama shows $14.41 million in fees but just about $42,365 in retained protocol revenue after costs — underscoring the difference between gross fees, reported fees and revenue actually retained by a protocol. Valente’s July figures do not include a linked dataset, explicit category definitions or a stated measurement period, so his shares should be treated as analysis-specific claims rather than independently verified facts.

Recent bankruptcies and closures underline the risk

Several high-profile cases provide concrete examples of how consolidation is playing out across centralized exchanges, lending platforms and infrastructure providers. Storj Labs initiated voluntary Chapter 11 proceedings in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of West Virginia (case 5:26-bk-00512) on July 26; Storj said it will keep its storage network operating while restructuring under court supervision. Separately, BitMEX announced a full platform shutdown scheduled for Sept. 23 following a strategic review by parent HDR Global Trading. BitMart’s formal wind-down notice stopped new registrations and deposits on July 26; the exchange plans to halt trading on Aug. 26 and cease platform operations on Jan. 31, 2027.

Broader project inactivity

Aggregated trackers also show a long tail of troubled projects. RootData’s 2026 dead-project archive lists 99 projects that have either announced closures, entered bankruptcy or been unavailable long-term. That dataset mixes different failure types — from temporary downtime to outright insolvency — so it should not be read as 99 confirmed bankruptcies. Still, when combined with other cases such as ZeroLend’s shutdown earlier in the year, these signals point to closures across multiple market segments rather than a problem isolated to one niche.

M&A activity: buyers targeting infrastructure and talent

Consolidation is not only about failures; acquisitions are reshaping industry structure as well. On July 27 Payward, the parent company of Kraken, agreed to buy Magic Labs’ wallet-as-a-service business. The acquired stack reportedly supports over 60 million wallets, more than $10 billion in stablecoin volume and around 200,000 developers. The deal will add embedded, non-custodial wallets to Payward Services, accelerating an inorganic path to buildout of wallet infrastructure without building from scratch. Financial terms were not disclosed, and the acquisition is expected to close in the coming weeks.

Revenue winners can still face decline

Even projects that remain among the top revenue earners are not immune to reduced activity. Pump.fun’s revenue and volume remained below 2025 levels despite product tweaks and fee-policy changes — a pattern consistent with Valente’s broader argument that peak-era performance does not guarantee sustained market share or growth in a consolidating environment.

What to expect: M&A, bankruptcies, shutdowns and talent deals

Valente projects continued industry consolidation over the coming months, forecasting additional mergers and acquisitions, more Chapter 11 filings, targeted shutdowns and strategic hires or talent-focused acquisitions. He did not provide a numerical forecast or a timetable; his conclusion is a forward-looking assessment grounded in recent data points and market developments rather than a precise prediction. The next confirmed milestones will be driven by corporate deadlines, court records and formal closing announcements — for example, BitMEX’s Sept. 23 shutdown deadline for user positions and withdrawals, BitMart’s Aug. 26 trading cutoff, and Storj’s court-supervised restructuring timeline.

What stakeholders should watch

Investors, developers and protocol operators should monitor several leading indicators: protocol revenue retention versus gross fees, developer activity and on-chain volume, exchange and treasury liquidity, pending court filings, and announced M&A transactions. Distinguishing between gross fee figures and retained protocol revenue is critical for evaluating sustainability and tokenomics. Dashboards like DeFiLlama are useful for snapshots but require careful interpretation alongside balance-sheet disclosures, governance proposals and court documents.

Implications for the crypto ecosystem

The current consolidation wave could have mixed long-term effects. On one hand, it may accelerate the survival of higher-quality infrastructure and strengthen security and UX through larger, better-funded operators. On the other hand, reduced competition could concentrate market power, impact tokenomics, and create single points of failure if too much revenue and activity cluster with a few providers. For builders and users, the near-term environment will likely favor projects with clear paths to sustainable revenue, tight cost controls and strong community governance.

As consolidation unfolds, transparent measurement and consistent methodology will matter more than ever to accurately assess protocol health, protocol revenue, and ecosystem resilience. Market participants should treat headline concentration figures as analytical signals that warrant deeper investigation into underlying datasets, metrics and accounting conventions.

In short, recent bankruptcies, exchange wind-downs and strategic acquisitions provide tangible support for ARK’s view that crypto is consolidating — but the pace, shape and systemic consequences of that consolidation will depend on how market actors, courts and capital providers respond in the months ahead.

Sofia Marin

“With a background in economics and digital markets, I write about startups, finance, and the trends transforming the global economy.”

Leave a Comment

Comments (3)

skyspin

Feels overhyped. consolidation is real but headlines miss nuance, many teams pivot not vanish. watch on-chain flows, tho

labcore

Is this even true? 67% from two apps screams methodology issues. need raw dataset, time window, and net retained revenue, not just gross fees

coinpilot

wow didnt expect revenue to be THAT concentrated! scary for smaller builders, hope talent and $$$ finds new homes fast